Watch video review!
Cast Hexagon
- Object
- Take the pieces out and put back together
- Difficulty
- Level 8 - Demanding
- Brand
- Hanayama
- Dimensions
- 6.2 cm x 6.5 cm x 0.7 cm / 2.44 in x 2.56 in x 0.28 in
- Packaging
- Cardboard Box
Request the FREE solution for this item!
Get ready to tackle the challenge of the Cast Hexagon metal puzzle from Hanayama Huzzle. This intricate 3D cast metal puzzle is crafted from high quality metal and features a unique hexagonal design that will put your problem solving skills to the test. This puzzle is made up of a collection of hexagon shaped pieces, with three inside pieces and an outside frame. The pieces appear to have the same shape, but the exterior and interior are different.
The puzzle's objective is to slide the inner pieces around inside the frame and rotate them to try to get them out of the frame. Designed by Mineyuki Uyematsu, the Cast Hexagon's sleek and modern appearance makes for a great gift for him or her, perfect for metal mechanical puzzle enthusiasts and those who appreciate a good brain teaser puzzle.
-
Material: Metal.
-
Category: Metal Puzzles.
-
Difficulty Level: Challenging, 8/10.
-
Brain teaser puzzle lovers.
-
Adults looking for a challenging and fun activity.
-
Unique gift for him or her.
-
Birthdays.
-
Christmas.
-
Hard to buy for individuals.
-
Those who enjoy metal mechanical puzzles and brain teasers.
-
Custom puzzle enthusiasts.
-
Anyone looking for a unique and engaging gift for friends and family.
Write your own review
4 out of 5 stars
-
It takes a little logic and more patience to solve. 90% of the time I just twisted at random and everything worked out)) The puzzle is not bad, but without the "wow" effect. You can disassemble/assemble once.★★★★Friday January 8th Aleksey wrote,
-
I love it, partially because I was not only able to solve it, but did it enough times to say I've mastered it. What a delight! Just don't ask me how long it took. Ha. And I'm poor at solving most of Hanayama's puzzles.★★★★★Sunday October 14th Fred Beavon wrote,
-
Not fully fond of this one. It is not bad, the solution is decent and not easy, but I expected more of it.★★★★Sunday September 16th Lyubomir Lalev wrote,
-
I mostly agree with what Zach wrote, although I would add that a little thought while solving it will help speed the process. I rated it a little higher because it is something new and different. I would rate the difficulty lower by one.★★★★Thursday May 12th luxige wrote,
-
This is the kind that you just fiddle around with until it falls apart. But I don't think most people will ever have an intuition for how to solve it quickly. Move stuff around, move it around some more, keep moving, oops been here before, move some more, 30m-1h later you'll solve it. So I'm giving it 3 stars because there's not some kind of aha! moment, hidden secret, or clever observation required to it. Just patience.★★★Friday January 22nd Zach wrote,